No digital communication is secure.
-- Tim Clemente, former FBI counterterrorism agent
Src: Are all telephone calls recorded and accessible to the US government? | Glenn Greenwald | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk
Seeking to diagnose and treat everyday information security problems
No digital communication is secure.
The reality is, our ability to exchange electronic information is already well beyond our ability to control it.
As long as I have an adversary spending his treasure ... nothing static will remain secure -- that's the nature of arms races. It is a guarantee that the system will be found vulnerable. So I think to a large extent we have to stop fooling ourselves that we actually can create completely secure systems. We certainly need to create the best system we can, but that system cannot remain static. It has to change, morph, grow over time, as we learn about our adversaries' behavior.
Threats are more interconnected and viral. Events which at first blush seem local and irrelevant can quickly set off transnational disruptions that affect U.S. national interests. "War" now includes a software variant -- a soft war variation. Arms include cyber and financial weapons, and attacks can be deniable and non-attributable.
For someone doing a targeted attack, AV is not too much of an obstacle. The fraudster has all the information he needs to run tests against an AV program and ensure he can defeat it. Today you can buy, in the underground market, tests for banking Trojans to ensure they're not detected by AV.
Threats are more diverse, interconnected and viral than at any time in history. Attacks, which might involve cyber and financial weapons, can be deniable and unattributable. Destruction can be invisible, latent and progressive.